[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15941808#comment-15941808
]
Michael J. Carey commented on ASTERIXDB-1858:
---------------------------------------------
One other thought: Using the JSON formatter should probably be the default when
the selected format is JSON? The current user experience is a little wierd
with the "Format JSON" check box - I don't think we should have that there - I
think instead we should add another pull-down option in the formats box, since
the formatter only works when the format is JSON and is otherwise ignored -
these check boxes are for query optimization stages. For the format, let's
have "JSON" and "JSON (formatted)" as options, perhaps?
NOTE: This is a fantastic new feature in the UI! :-)
> Tiny tweak for new JSON formatting (display) option?
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERIXDB-1858
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1858
> Project: Apache AsterixDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael J. Carey
> Assignee: Xikui Wang
> Priority: Minor
>
> Could the UI use term "fields" instead of "items" there? I think that would
> be clearer. (The first thing "item" binds to for me is "record" - whereas
> here it is referring to how many fields.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
