[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15941810#comment-15941810
]
Michael J. Carey commented on ASTERIXDB-1858:
---------------------------------------------
Final note (for now): It might be that "items" is something that the library
we're using just does - in which case this is not an easy change - in which
case nevermind! (But if it is an easy change, "fields" would be nice for
record field counts, and "items" is great for list items, terminology-wise.)
> Tiny tweak for new JSON formatting (display) option?
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERIXDB-1858
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1858
> Project: Apache AsterixDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael J. Carey
> Assignee: Xikui Wang
> Priority: Minor
>
> Could the UI use term "fields" instead of "items" there? I think that would
> be clearer. (The first thing "item" binds to for me is "record" - whereas
> here it is referring to how many fields.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
