jiangphcn opened a new pull request #1581: [WIP] Fix dialyzer warning of shard 
record construction
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1581
 
 
   <!-- Thank you for your contribution!
   
        Please file this form by replacing the Markdown comments
        with your text. If a section needs no action - remove it.
   
        Also remember, that CouchDB uses the Review-Then-Commit (RTC) model
        of code collaboration. Positive feedback is represented +1 from 
committers
        and negative is a -1. The -1 also means veto, and needs to be addressed
        to proceed. Once there are no objections, the PR can be merged by a
        CouchDB committer.
   
        See: http://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#decisions for more info. -->
   
   ## Overview
   
   <!-- Please give a short brief for the pull request,
        what problem it solves or how it makes things better. -->
   
   The violation of shard record construction is reported in several files, 
including  `fabric_doc_open_revs.erl`, `cpse_test_purge_replication.erl`, etc. 
This PR is aimed to address these warnings.
   ```
   src/fabric_doc_open_revs.erl:0: in 
fabric_doc_open_revs:check_finish_quorum/0[385-396]:Record construction 
#shard{node::'node1',range::'undefined'} violates the declared type of field 
range::'_' | ['$1' | '$2' | non_neg_integer()]
   
   src/cpse_test_purge_replication.erl:0: in 
cpse_test_purge_replication:make_shard/1[196-201]:Record construction 
#shard{node::atom(),range::[0 | 4294967295,...],opts::'undefined'} violates the 
declared type of field opts::[any()]
   
   ```
   
   ## Testing recommendations
   
   <!-- Describe how we can test your changes.
        Does it provides any behaviour that the end users
        could notice? -->
   Run dialyzer tool and make sure there are no complains about shard record 
construction
   1. Prepare for analysis:
     ```
   make build-plt
     ```
   2. Run analysis 
     ```
   make dialyze
     ```
   
   ## Related Issues or Pull Requests
   
   <!-- If your changes affects multiple components in different
        repositories please put links to those issues or pull requests here.  
-->
   https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1580
   
   ## Checklist
   
   - [X] Code is written and works correctly;
   - [X] Changes are covered by tests;
   - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes;
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to