[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16439675#comment-16439675
 ] 

Remko Popma commented on GROOVY-8520:
-------------------------------------

I now believe the remaining failing test is really the result of an 
idiosyncrasy in commons-cli:

When a parameter is attached to the short option (e.g. {{-a1}}), the value of 
{{args}} is ignored. No validation error like "error: Missing argument for 
option: a" ever occurs.

To illustrate:
{code}
// using GROOVY_2_5_X branch: CliBuilder based on commons-cli
def cli = new CliBuilder()
cli.a(args: 2, 'arguments')

assertNull(cli.parse(['-a', '1'])) // as expected: '-a' option needs 2 params

options = cli.parse(['-a1']) // I would expect parsing to fail, but it succeeds.
assertEquals('1', options.a) // Why is 1 option-param okay here? 

assertNull(cli.parse(['-a', '1', '-a', '2'])) // as expected: each '-a' option 
needs 2 params

options = cli.parse(['-a1', '-a2'])
assertEquals('1', options.a) // similar to preceding; why does this succeed?... 
assertEquals(['1', '2'], options.as)

options = cli.parse(['-a1', '-a2', '-a3'])
assertEquals(['1', '2', '3'], options.as) // even this is okay...
{code}

Is this behaviour desirable? If so, I can add an option to picocli to ignore 
arity for attached option-arguments. Do we want to support this behaviour?

While adding more tests, another behaviour I noticed that I found strange is 
this:
{code}
def cli = new CliBuilder()
cli.b(args: 2, valueSeparator: ',', 'arguments')
options = cli.parse(['-b1,2,3'])

assert options.bs == ['1', '2']
       |       |  |
       |       |  false
       |       ['1', '2,3']
       groovy.util.OptionAccessor@ba2f4ec
{code}
I would expect the parser to split first, and then to validate the result. It 
looks like, counter to my expectations, common-cli stops splitting when the 
input has been split into {{args}} chunks. The last chunk may still contain the 
value separator character.

Again, is this behaviour desirable, and should it be supported?

> Replace commons-cli with picocli in CliBuilder
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-8520
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8520
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: command line processing
>            Reporter: Remko Popma
>            Priority: Major
>
> This ticket proposes to replace commons-cli with picocli in 
> {{groovy.util.CliBuilder}}.
> See [discussion on the mailing 
> list|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d60b6d5d4411e9ba0d7dc209cde8a9bb4abb00f0b9c0322f068c322e@%3Cdev.groovy.apache.org%3E]
>  for the original proposal and comparison with other CLI libraries.
> Goals for the initial implementation:
> * preserve the current CliBuilder behaviour as much as possible
> * deliver an implementation, tests and documentation in time to be included 
> in the 2.5 GA release



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to