[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18133073#comment-18133073
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-11492:
-----------------------------------------

github-actions[bot] commented on PR #3054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/3054#issuecomment-6448189577

   ### JMH summary — classic (commit `35a8fc7`)
   
   Speedup vs trailing 90-day baseline on gh-pages. Higher = faster.
   `1.00` = in line with history. Per-benchmark ratio, geomean within group.
   Time-per-op units inverted so direction is consistent. The *calibrated*
   column divides out this runner's speed vs the baseline hardware, as
   measured by Groovy-independent pure-Java ruler benchmarks.
   
   | Group  | Speedup | Calibrated | n |
   |--------|---------|------------|---|
   | bench | 1.601 × | 0.966 × | 124 |
   | core | 1.379 × | 1.128 × | 108 |
   | grails | 1.461 × | 1.196 × | 80 |
   
   No benchmark is ≥1.5× slower than its 90-day baseline.
   
   > ⚠️ Runner speed differs ≥15% from the historical baseline hardware for: 
bench, core-ag, core-hz, grails-ad, grails-ez. Raw speedups are not meaningful 
for those parts — use the calibrated column.
   
   <sub>Runner calibration (this run vs baseline hardware): bench 1.64× (27 
rulers) · core-ag 1.21× (3 rulers) · core-hz 1.24× (3 rulers) · grails-ad 1.20× 
(3 rulers) · grails-ez 1.24× (3 rulers)</sub>
   
   <sub>Baseline: <code>dev/bench/jmh/&lt;part&gt;/classic/data.js</code> on 
gh-pages, trailing 90 days. <a 
href="https://apache.github.io/groovy/dev/bench/jmh/summary.html";>Daily 
dashboard</a> · <a 
href="https://apache.github.io/groovy/dev/bench/jmh/";>Per-suite raw 
data</a></sub>
   
   <!

> Java compatibility: array initializers without "new Type[]"
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-11492
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11492
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: parser-antlr4
>            Reporter: Eric Milles
>            Assignee: Eric Milles
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: arrays
>
> There are a few cases where bare array initializers are not yet supported:
> # {{int[][] array = \{ \{1,2\}, \{3,4\} \};}}
> # {{@Target(\{ ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.METHOD \})}}
> # {code:groovy}@interface A {
>   String[] strings() default {}
> }
> {code}
> These were implemented as part of [1] but the PR was closed.  It may be worth 
> looking back over what was done and re-implementing one or more of these 
> cases.  It was noted that {{Closure[] array = \{\};}} is one of the edge 
> cases that leads to ambiguity.
> [1] https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/691



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)

Reply via email to