[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18133078#comment-18133078
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-11492:
-----------------------------------------
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #3054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/3054#issuecomment-6448410566
### JMH summary — indy (commit `35a8fc7`)
Speedup vs trailing 90-day baseline on gh-pages. Higher = faster.
`1.00` = in line with history. Per-benchmark ratio, geomean within group.
Time-per-op units inverted so direction is consistent. The *calibrated*
column divides out this runner's speed vs the baseline hardware, as
measured by Groovy-independent pure-Java ruler benchmarks.
| Group | Speedup | Calibrated | n |
|--------|---------|------------|---|
| bench | 0.955 × | 1.010 × | 124 |
| core | 2.180 × | 2.509 × | 108 |
| grails | 1.492 × | 1.426 × | 80 |
> ⚠️ **1 benchmark at least 1.5× slower than the 90-day baseline:**
> - `org.apache.groovy.bench.NonCapturingLambdaBench.capturingLambdaApply` —
1.71× slower (calibrated)
> ⚠️ Runner speed differs ≥15% from the historical baseline hardware for:
core-ag, grails-ez. Raw speedups are not meaningful for those parts — use the
calibrated column.
<sub>Runner calibration (this run vs baseline hardware): bench 0.95× (27
rulers) · core-ag 0.86× (3 rulers) · core-hz 0.88× (3 rulers) · grails-ad 0.89×
(3 rulers) · grails-ez 1.20× (3 rulers)</sub>
<sub>Baseline: <code>dev/bench/jmh/<part>/indy/data.js</code> on
gh-pages, trailing 90 days. <a
href="https://apache.github.io/groovy/dev/bench/jmh/summary.html";>Daily
dashboard</a> · <a
href="https://apache.github.io/groovy/dev/bench/jmh/";>Per-suite raw
data</a></sub>
<!
> Java compatibility: array initializers without "new Type[]"
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-11492
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11492
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parser-antlr4
> Reporter: Eric Milles
> Assignee: Eric Milles
> Priority: Major
> Labels: arrays
>
> There are a few cases where bare array initializers are not yet supported:
> # {{int[][] array = \{ \{1,2\}, \{3,4\} \};}}
> # {{@Target(\{ ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.METHOD \})}}
> # {code:groovy}@interface A {
> String[] strings() default {}
> }
> {code}
> These were implemented as part of [1] but the PR was closed. It may be worth
> looking back over what was done and re-implementing one or more of these
> cases. It was noted that {{Closure[] array = \{\};}} is one of the edge
> cases that leads to ambiguity.
> [1] https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/691
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)
