[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18133227#comment-18133227
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-11492:
-----------------------------------------
testlens-app[bot] commented on PR #3054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/3054#issuecomment-6452998187
## ✅ All tests passed ✅
🏷️ Commit: 79c4f0106d1cba9a9e41a5e04dd175bc5d4a2b2d
▶️ Tests: 123899 executed
⚪️ Checks: 32/32 completed
---
_Learn more about TestLens at
[testlens.app/docs](https://testlens.app/docs/features/pr-comment/)._
> Java compatibility: array initializers without "new Type[]"
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-11492
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11492
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parser-antlr4
> Reporter: Eric Milles
> Assignee: Eric Milles
> Priority: Major
> Labels: arrays
>
> There are a few cases where bare array initializers are not yet supported:
> # {{int[][] array = \{ \{1,2\}, \{3,4\} \};}}
> # {{@Target(\{ ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.METHOD \})}}
> # {code:groovy}@interface A {
> String[] strings() default {}
> }
> {code}
> These were implemented as part of [1] but the PR was closed. It may be worth
> looking back over what was done and re-implementing one or more of these
> cases. It was noted that {{Closure[] array = \{\};}} is one of the edge
> cases that leads to ambiguity.
> [1] https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/691
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)
