sanpwc commented on code in PR #2083:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/2083#discussion_r1197890952
##########
modules/table/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/table/distributed/SortedIndexLocker.java:
##########
@@ -45,18 +40,8 @@
* <p>Simply acquires lock on a given row for lookup and remove, acquires lock
on a next key for insert.
*/
public class SortedIndexLocker implements IndexLocker {
-
- private static final SchemaDescriptor INFINITY_TUPLE_SCHEMA = new
SchemaDescriptor(
- 1,
- new Column[]{
- new Column("indexId", NativeTypes.UUID, false),
- new Column("partId", NativeTypes.INT32, false)
- },
- new Column[0]
- );
-
/** Index INF+ value object. */
- private final BinaryTuple positiveInf;
+ private final Integer positiveInf;
Review Comment:
Well, to be honest, despite the fact that currently it should work because
index keys are Bytes, I'll still favor custom InfWrapper here.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@ignite.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
