sanpwc commented on code in PR #2083:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/2083#discussion_r1197890952


##########
modules/table/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/table/distributed/SortedIndexLocker.java:
##########
@@ -45,18 +40,8 @@
  * <p>Simply acquires lock on a given row for lookup and remove, acquires lock 
on a next key for insert.
  */
 public class SortedIndexLocker implements IndexLocker {
-
-    private static final SchemaDescriptor INFINITY_TUPLE_SCHEMA = new 
SchemaDescriptor(
-            1,
-            new Column[]{
-                    new Column("indexId", NativeTypes.UUID, false),
-                    new Column("partId", NativeTypes.INT32, false)
-            },
-            new Column[0]
-    );
-
     /** Index INF+ value object. */
-    private final BinaryTuple positiveInf;
+    private final Integer positiveInf;

Review Comment:
   Well, to be honest, despite the fact that currently it should work because 
index key is a byte array, I'll still favor custom InfWrapper here. Up to you 
though.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@ignite.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to