nacx commented on pull request #78:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jclouds/pull/78#issuecomment-650318652


   So, with the last update, this PR reverts back to the official gson library, 
which makes jclouds incompatible with OSGi.
   
   As mentioned in the different JIRA issues, we need to make a decision and 
find the balance between the cost of supporting OSGi in jclouds itself and 
being able to move forward faster. In my opinion, if we lack the OSGi expertise 
to do a proper job there, we should try to stop owning that and delegate that 
to end-users or to another community that can do it properly.
   
   In any case, this deserves a proper discussion in the jclouds dev/users 
mailing lists so the community is aware of the impact of the change. It would 
be great too, to trigger such a discussion cross-posting to jclouds-dev and 
karaf-dev. The Karaf community kindly took over the jclouds-karaf project and 
is now maintaining the Karaf and some OSGi bits. I think it makes a lot of 
sense to involve them in this topic and see also what is in their opinion the 
best way to keep OSGi support in jclouds from now on.
   
   I think reverting back to official gson should be put on hold until we have 
clarity on this, and we have a proper deprecation path and plan to make the 
community aware of the change.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to