sdedic commented on a change in pull request #2969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2969#discussion_r640372884
##########
File path: extide/gradle/arch.xml
##########
@@ -268,6 +268,13 @@ publishPlugins</args>
</actions>
</pre>
</api>
+ <api category="devel" group="java.io.File"
name="nb-actions-config.xml" type="export">
+ <p>
+ An extension of <a
href="#nb-actions-config.xml">nb-actions.config</a> is a per-Configuration
action mapping.
Review comment:
This is a good topic for a discussion, I believe: at this point, the
behaviour is +- consistent with Maven projects (which does not say anything
about being valid). In a purist's view, the action mapping does not belong to
the project shared metadata at all:
- if an option (task, argument) is to be seen by the project itself, it
should be put to the buildscript (pom) in a native way.
- if the project team agrees to share IDE-related metadata, it's best to
have them file-separated, IMHO, from the project file(s) that are used by CI
- if the action mapping is not to be shared, it's best to put on
`.gitignore` list;
You're right that people frown upon `nbproject` and the like directories in
VCS, but I see people routinely put their `.idea` directories to `.gitignore`
lists. In a sense, its current impl that merges `gradle.properties` values that
might affect CI with IDE-related setting may be also frowned upon.
So I would stick to that pattern, and **document** to put
```
**/nb-actions*.xml
**/nb-configuration*.xml
```
to `.gitignore` -- that would work for both Maven and Gradle.
@lkishalmi -- what's your take on this ? I can +- easily change impl to
persist all mappings to `gradle.properties` (using other prefixes); but that
would eventually put there even customizations for private configurations (not
sharable through `nb-configurations.xml`). I have no strong preference, as I
can believe see benefits (or better consistency) of either solution, but
slightly inclined to the separated files (although possibly in a subdir to
limit the project pollution).
Re. this IDE-metadata as a general topic (should we create, should it be
collected in a subdir, how to tackle private info - see
[NETBEANS-5711](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5711): shouldn't
it be debated on a mailing list instead ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
