mbien commented on PR #8566: URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/8566#issuecomment-3146399139
It reflects the state of the implementation. This isn't difficult to revert since it is just a label. All what is needed is a committer which wants to maintain it, fix the showstopper bugs and an implementation which works with mvn 3/4, annotation processors and common mvn plugins, then communicate it to the user that this feature will use a different compiler to copy bytecode into the build folder with all the "interesting" problems this can cause even if it perfectly works. Even if this would be resolved, I would be -0 (I won't help and won't support it), since in context of tooling daemons this is the wrong place to implement such feature in 2025. I doubt that letting everyone who votes -1 inherit the implementation is a good way to find maintainers though - but we could try ;) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
