neilcsmith-net commented on PR #8566: URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/8566#issuecomment-3146426440
> I doubt that letting everyone who votes -1 inherit the implementation is a good way to find maintainers though - but we could try ;) I assumed this was meant as a code -1, ie. a veto. A veto needs to be technically justified and propose some alternative way forward, and a willingness to make that alternative happen. For all the reasons mentioned, and more, the current label is correct, while in theory reversible. At some point those issues may (probably inevitably will) lead to the need to remove or fix. If someone vetoes the removal they will _have_ to propose the fix and ensure it happens. Personally, I'd love to see the removal of CoS anyway, and was switching it off everywhere for about a decade before we changed the default. It is the wrong place to implement and in many ways antithetical to NetBeans' approach to build systems. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
