[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16318266#comment-16318266
 ] 

Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-10150 at 6/28/19 9:30 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

This is not a bug but could be an improvement so only concerns the trunk. Such 
a thing should be discussed 1st on dev ML prior to create a Jira.


was (Author: jacques.le.roux):
This is not a bug but could be an improvement son concern only the trunk. Such 
a thing should be discussed 1st on dev ML prior to create a Jira.

> supplierProductId Should Have Consistent Types Across Entities.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-10150
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10150
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: order, product
>    Affects Versions: Trunk
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: jesse thomas
>            Assignee: Rohit Hukkeri
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: OFBIZ-10150.patch
>
>
> During some data migration I hit an issue where my data for supplierProductId 
> was too long. So I looked up the fields and noticed that the order item 
> entity had a different type for the field than the supplier product entity. I 
> think it would be a good idea to pick one so the two fields can be treated 
> consistently. I would vote for id-long, but I think either way it would be 
> good to have them be the same type. There are other fields that have this 
> issue too if you are interested?
>   
> Thanks!
> applications/datamodel/entitydef/order-entitymodel.xml:      
> <entity entity-name="OrderItem".......
> <field name="supplierProductId" type="id-long"></field>
> applications/datamodel/entitydef/product-entitymodel.xml:      
> <entity entity-name="SupplierProduct"......
> <field name="supplierProductId" type="id"></field>



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to