[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17193581#comment-17193581
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-11955:
-----------------------------------------
Hi Alex,
Here you go:
$ patch -p1 -R < variantinfojs-undo.patch
patching file
applications/order/groovyScripts/entry/catalog/InlineProductDetail.groovy
Unreversed patch detected! Ignore -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n] y
Hunk #1 succeeded at 105 with fuzz 2 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 287.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 301.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
applications/order/groovyScripts/entry/catalog/InlineProductDetail.groovy.rej
patching file
applications/order/groovyScripts/entry/catalog/ProductDetail.groovy
Unreversed patch detected! Ignore -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n] Y
Skipping patch.
5 out of 5 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file
applications/order/groovyScripts/entry/catalog/ProductDetail.groovy.rej
patching file
applications/order/groovyScripts/entry/catalog/ProductSummary.groovy
Unreversed patch detected! Ignore -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n] Y
Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file
applications/order/groovyScripts/entry/catalog/ProductSummary.groovy.rej
patching file applications/order/template/entry/catalog/ProductDetail.ftl
Unreversed patch detected! Ignore -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n] y
Hunk #1 FAILED at 279.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 479.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 496.
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
applications/order/template/entry/catalog/ProductDetail.ftl.rej
patching file applications/order/template/entry/catalog/ProductSummary.ftl
Unreversed patch detected! Ignore -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n] y
Hunk #1 FAILED at 49.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 97.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 104 with fuzz 2 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 137.
3 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
applications/order/template/entry/catalog/ProductSummary.ftl.rej
patching file
applications/order/template/entry/catalog/ProductUomDropDownOnly.ftl
Unreversed patch detected! Ignore -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
applications/order/template/entry/catalog/ProductUomDropDownOnly.ftl.rej
The next patch, when reversed, would create the file
applications/order/template/entry/catalog/ProductVariantJS.ftl,
which already exists! Ignore -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n] n
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
patching file applications/order/widget/ordermgr/OrderEntryCatalogScreens.xml
Hunk #1 succeeded at 74 (offset 8 lines).
[^ProductUomDropDownOnly.ftl.rej] [^ProductSummary.ftl.rej]
[^ProductDetail.ftl.rej] [^ProductSummary.groovy.rej]
[^ProductDetail.groovy.rej] [^InlineProductDetail.groovy.rej]
> display/selection of unit of measure is broken
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11955
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11955
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ecommerce, order
> Affects Versions: Release Branch 17.12, Trunk
> Reporter: Alex Bodnaru
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: Image 002.png, Image 002.png, Image damned.png,
> Image1.png, InlineProductDetail.groovy.rej, ProductDetail.ftl.rej,
> ProductDetail.groovy.rej, ProductSummary.ftl.rej, ProductSummary.groovy.rej,
> ProductUomDropDownOnly.ftl.rej, ProductVariantJS.ftl,
> image-2020-08-22-13-00-44-947.png, image-2020-08-22-13-00-57-856.png,
> image-2020-08-22-13-03-22-775.png, image-2020-08-22-13-04-07-722.png,
> variantinfojs-1.patch, variantinfojs-2.patch, variantinfojs-3.patch,
> variantinfojs-data.xml, variantinfojs-final.patch, variantinfojs-undo.patch
>
>
> checkAmtReq and getVariantPrice are broken for similar reasons, too.
> the display and selection of alternative uom elements occur in multiple
> forms, one for each product: whether detailed or in summary. thus, they
> should be marked by names and classes, not by ids, that are unique in the
> entire document.
> the bug did not manifest in demo data, since only one product has alternative
> packaging.
> i did duplicate wg-1111* products and arranged their relations. is, btw, a
> way to export product trees in order to share them?
> the fix does span the framework and ecommerce repositories.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)