[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17441328#comment-17441328
]
ddev commented on OFBIZ-12364:
------------------------------
>Yes, OFBIZ-12021 was resolved. But got reverted, because of some testing
>issues. Which didn't get registered here in Jira as separate issues. And given
>the priority of that ticket being 'Minor' it got brushed aside. I have
>corrected that aspect today on the ticket (raising it to priority 'Major').
>Hopefully it attracts the attention of a contributor soon.
Thanks! I believe it's some kind of derby-specific problem that happened, so
maybe there is a way to tag it in such a way that someone who understands derby
might pick it up?
I've set all issues I've reported to "minor" (except i forgot to do it on this
one) as I didn't want to seem like a drama queen, but perhaps I misunderstood
the definition of "major" in this context :). (I was thinking major would mean
like something deserving of changing the ofbiz version number).
>There are multiple examples in the demo dataset where some fields of an entity
>are not set. Though it would be nice to have all fields of all demo record
>definitions (an we will get there, time and a contributor willing), it is no
>deal breaker.
I believe there are also some fields in the data model that do not get
displayed anywhere in the ofbiz system.
I'm hoping to add more demo/seed data, but last time I did that I got no
response: ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12036 ). Then again, I
marked that as minor too. Maybe I should move it up to major?
> Incorrect definition and usage of EmplPositionType?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-12364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12364
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: humanres
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: ddev
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: ofbiz-empl-position-type-patch.diff
>
>
> In the Data Model Resouce Book, on page 326 (or on page 306, depending on how
> you are counting pages), it shows EmplPositionType having fields "title" for
> the position title, and "description" to describe what the position is
> supposed to be about.
> However, EmplPositionType in ofbiz is missing the "title" field.
> Fixing this is a simple one line patch.
> However, additionally ofbiz seed data seems to put the title data in the
> description field, like so:
> applications/datamodel/data/seed/HumanResSeedData.xml: <EmplPositionType
> description="Chief Executive Officer" hasTable="N" emplPositionTypeId="CEO"/>
> This is a simple patch as well (patch is attached)
> But does this mean we would assume that people are putting the title in the
> description field in their local database, meaning we wouldn't patch it
> without some kind of translation system to move the description data to the
> title field. What about those people who are using the field correctly
> already?
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
