[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-12688:
------------------------------------
Summary: Change SystemProperty entity name to BusinessProperty (was:
Change SystemProperty name to BusinessProperty)
> Change SystemProperty entity name to BusinessProperty
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-12688
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12688
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ALL COMPONENTS
> Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch
> Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
> Priority: Minor
>
> This refer to a comment I made in OFBIZ-7112: https://s.apache.org/ivrq6
> The crux being:
> {quote}
> It's a long time now we have the SystemProperty entity[...]
> When we discussed about it before the implementation, it was clear that only
> business (ie not system) properties should be concerned. To be clear, for me
> the system properties are the properties in files at
> framework/start/src/main/resources/org/apache/ofbiz/base/start/ and some
> other files like freemarkerTransforms.properties, fop.properties,
> catalina.properties, debug.properties, owasp.properties, security.properties,
> requestHandler.properties, url.properties and maybe some others I missed
> # So the 1st flaw was to name this entity SystemProperty. It should have been
> named BusinessProperty. We could consider rename it, but that's minor in
> comparison with the second flaw
> # The second flaw is that we kept the business properties files. To avoid
> duplication and confusion all the business properties should be in the
> database and a specific UI should be created to easier handled them.
> {quote}
> This issue concents only the 1st point
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
