mdedetrich commented on issue #39:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/issues/39#issuecomment-3144502882

   In general I am not against dropping Scala 2.12  but there are 2 points I 
would raise
   
   1. Afaik (and I would like this to be confirmed), Scala 2.12 version of 
Pekko is still the most downloaded version of Pekko. The situation with this is 
even worse than with JDK 1.8, who appears to only have a few users using it 
(albeit those uses are quite critical i.e. enterprise). We should investigate 
how and why this is the case.
   2. I wouldn't overblow the amount of effort required to support Scala 2.12. 
Pretty much every difference between the Scala versions has already been 
accounted for with our Pekko utils which abstracts over all Scala versions and 
the biggest divergence we have is between Scala 3 and Scala 2. Unlike JDK 1.8 
with all of the various sbt build workarounds/Java 9 bespoke module stuff we 
have to deal with (which doesn't exist in JDK11+), Scala 2.12 only has some 
slightly different calls for specific library components. tl;dr, maintenance 
burden for Scala 2.12 is a weak argument all things considered.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-h...@pekko.apache.org

Reply via email to