mkurz commented on PR #1114: URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko-http/pull/1114#issuecomment-4852120253
> I see netty have many compression support, should we do that too? For this PR, no. This PR should stay focused on RFC 7692 `permessage-deflate`, which is the relevant standardized WebSocket compression extension. Netty also has legacy `deflate-frame` / `x-webkit-deflate-frame` support. I intentionally did not add those because they are historical, non-standard extension names from before RFC 7692 standardized `permessage-deflate`. For our new implementation in pekko-http, I think it is better to support the standardized extension first and only add legacy extensions later if users report a concrete compatibility need (which I highly doubt). This avoids increased code, tests, and configuration surface for very little practical benefit. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
