[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15960939#comment-15960939
]
David W. Lotts commented on RYA-266:
------------------------------------
Jenkins found a failed test, table name is null:
RyaDirectExampleTest(ExamplesTest) Time elapsed: 1.323 sec <<< ERROR!
org.openrdf.query.QueryEvaluationException: While creating a scanner for a
temporal query. table name=null The temporal index table should have been
created by this constructor, if found missing.
at
org.apache.accumulo.core.client.mock.MockConnector.createScanner(MockConnector.java:111)
at
org.apache.rya.indexing.accumulo.ConfigUtils.createScanner(ConfigUtils.java:234)
...
at
org.openrdf.repository.sail.SailTupleQuery.evaluate(SailTupleQuery.java:76)
at
RyaDirectExample.testAddAndTemporalSearchWithPCJ(RyaDirectExample.java:295)
at RyaDirectExample.main(RyaDirectExample.java:106)
at ExamplesTest.RyaDirectExampleTest(ExamplesTest.java:35)
> Temporal index fails to write when using non-mock accumulo
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RYA-266
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-266
> Project: Rya
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: dao, sail
> Environment: indexing
> Reporter: David W. Lotts
> Assignee: David W. Lotts
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: flush, index, temporal
> Original Estimate: 24h
> Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> Temporal indexing writes nothing to it's table name: [prefix]temporal.
> It does seem to work for a mock instance. It might also work for a large
> ingest since it would force a flush.
> See the parent RYA-72 for an explanation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
