[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16615424#comment-16615424
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on RYA-135:
------------------------------------

Github user isper3at commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-rya/pull/300#discussion_r217849215
  
    --- Diff: 
extras/indexing/src/main/java/org/apache/rya/indexing/mongodb/AbstractMongoIndexer.java
 ---
    @@ -73,12 +72,12 @@
         protected T storageStrategy;
     
         private MongoDbBatchWriter<DBObject> mongoDbBatchWriter;
    +    protected String collectionName;
    --- End diff --
    
    yes, the implementations of AbstractMongoIndexer set it in the init() 
function.  I can't have it in the constructor because of the hadoop/reflexive 
construction


> Confusing configuration: CONF_TBL_PREFIX versus  MONGO_COLLECTION_PREFIX 
> versus RyaInstance
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RYA-135
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-135
>             Project: Rya
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sail
>            Reporter: David W. Lotts
>            Assignee: Andrew Smith
>            Priority: Minor
>
> These THREE constants [#1] [#2] [#3] are somewhat redundant.  They are the 
> the same as the Rya Instance in most cases.  For MongoDB, the table 
> prefix[#2] may be used incorrectly instead of the collection prefix[#1].
> They should probably be melded into one config key and method and be called 
> the rya instance.  The RyaDetails has this concept.  There is a 
> ConfigUtil.getTablePrefix() and TablePrefixLayoutStrategy.getTablePrefix()  
> that should be refactored as part of this.
> Some have suggested that the collection prefix is not needed at all since it 
> is scoped inside a single Mongo Database which contains only one rya instance.
> {anchor:1}1  {code} conf.set(MongoDBRdfConfiguration.MONGO_COLLECTION_PREFIX, 
> "rya_");{code}
> {anchor:2}2  {code}conf.set(RdfCloudTripleStoreConfiguration.CONF_TBL_PREFIX, 
> "rya_");{code}
> {anchor:3}3  {code}TablePrefixLayoutStrategy.tablePrefix = 
> RdfCloudTripleStoreConstants.TBL_PRFX_DEF; // = "rya_";{code}
> Some unit tests set them as different values.
> Look at  
> extras/indexing/src/main/java/mvm/rya/sail/config/RyaSailFactory.java around 
> line 73 for a good example of the confusion.  Look for this comment:
> // XXX Should(?) be MongoDBRdfConfiguration.MONGO_COLLECTION_PREFIX inside 
> the if below.
> One more redundant field: TablePrefixLayoutStrategy.tablePrefix   See RYA-138
> It is defaults to "rya_" but has a getter and setter.
> {code}
> TablePrefixLayoutStrategy implements TableLayoutStrategy{
>     private String tablePrefix = RdfCloudTripleStoreConstants.TBL_PRFX_DEF;
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to