funky-eyes commented on PR #7337:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/pull/7337#issuecomment-2870979019

   > > This design is to callback the ChannelEventListener registered by TM and 
RM, rather than adding a listener after channel.write(), right?
   > 
   > Yes, that's correct.
   > 
   > It is implemented in a way that calls back the `ChannelEventListener` 
registered in advance by TM and RM, so that user-defined actions can be 
performed when the channel event is detected.
   
   I think this design is good, but since this functionality is not a 
user-facing API, it shouldn't be a feature-type PR. I believe it should be 
changed to an optimize type instead. Could you also fix the codecov/patch issue 
by adding some test cases to increase coverage? Of course, you could also 
improve unit test coverage in a subsequent PR.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@seata.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@seata.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-h...@seata.apache.org

Reply via email to