ClaireLytt commented on PR #39093: URL: https://github.com/apache/shardingsphere/pull/39093#issuecomment-5001811120
Could maintainers please advise which direction I should take? * multi-statement batch rewriting * routine-body rewriting * internal groundwork only, without a user-facing support claim For this PR, I lean toward option 3: keep the binder/table-extractor groundwork and tests, but avoid a user-facing Encrypt support claim until a runnable path exists. I’m open to maintainer guidance if another direction is preferred. Also, should I remove or soften the RELEASE-NOTES / Encrypt “supported” wording until a runnable path exists? btw, @terrymanu Could you please add a tag `type: discussion`? Thanks! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
