wu-sheng commented on a change in pull request #51:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/skywalking-data-collect-protocol/pull/51#discussion_r618447490



##########
File path: service-mesh-probe/service-mesh.proto
##########
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ message ServiceMeshMetric {
     // The sidecar/proxy internal error code, the value bases on the 
implementation.
     // The envoy internal error codes are listed here, 
https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/api-v2/data/accesslog/v2/accesslog.proto#data-accesslog-v2-responseflags
     string internalErrorCode = 14;
+
+    // The throughput detail of the mesh metrics.
+    Throughput throughput = 15;

Review comment:
       But we have OAL related to the latency, if you share the existing one, I 
think the metrics there would be wrong.
   
   What do you think? Should we have ServiceMeshTCPMetric?




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to