hanahmily commented on PR #309: URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking-banyandb/pull/309#issuecomment-1658545419
> > > Local file system calling remote file system? What is that about? I don't think we should list that. If there is a local fs API mock for remote system, that is local fs API side thing, not ours. > > > > > > It is not local file system calling remote file system.Under the strategy of using remote storage, data is not directly stored on remote storage, but is first stored in the local file system and then transferred remotely after the file reaches a certain size. > > Yes, that is how the remote file system works. But is that BanyanDB's concern? @hanahmily I am not aware of we are getting that far. Certainly. The FS system, a virtual file system, hides the details of all the OS-related or third-party APIs. As I previously noted in [clustering](https://github.com/apache/skywalking-banyandb/blob/main/docs/concept/clustering.md#5-writes-in-a-cluster), S3, a classic remote share storage system, will be integrated into the FS system discussed here. But the S3 integration is at the very beginning phase, we only need to document where the integration point is in the banyandb. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
