hanahmily commented on PR #309: URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking-banyandb/pull/309#issuecomment-1659937567
> This is my point. How virtual fs works should not be explained by us. From our arch graph perspective, if we have two storage adaptors, one for local, the other for remote, let's make them parallel listed as the callees of fs adaptor layers. If the remote fs is always considered hidden from local fs, I think local fs is our only adapter target. There are two options here: 1. The locally mounted storage 2. The locally mounted storage + shared remote storage Based on the above, two separate make more sense to me. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
