codeant-ai-for-open-source[bot] commented on code in PR #39914:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/pull/39914#discussion_r3476587426


##########
superset/reports/notifications/slackv2.py:
##########
@@ -77,7 +77,18 @@ def _get_inline_files(
             return ("pdf", [self._content.pdf])
         return (None, [])
 
-    @backoff.on_exception(backoff.expo, SlackApiError, factor=10, base=2, 
max_tries=5)
+    # Retry on NotificationUnprocessableException (the wrapper that send()
+    # raises for transient Slack failures: SlackApiError, connection errors,
+    # and the SlackClientError catch-all). Retrying on SlackApiError directly
+    # would never fire because the try/except below converts it before the
+    # decorator can see it. Mirrors the pattern in webhook.py.
+    @backoff.on_exception(
+        backoff.expo,
+        NotificationUnprocessableException,
+        factor=10,
+        base=2,
+        max_tries=5,
+    )
     @statsd_gauge("reports.slack.send")
     def send(self) -> None:

Review Comment:
   **Suggestion:** Retrying the entire `send` method on 
`NotificationUnprocessableException` can duplicate already-sent Slack 
messages/files when a failure happens mid-loop (for example after some channels 
succeeded and a later channel fails). On retry, the method replays all prior 
channels/files from the beginning, causing duplicate notifications. Move retry 
handling to the individual Slack API call level (or add idempotency guards) so 
only failed sends are retried. [logic error]
   
   <details>
   <summary><b>Severity Level:</b> Major ⚠️</summary>
   
   ```mdx
   - ❌ Slack alerts duplicate messages across channels on retry.
   - ⚠️ Multi-channel Slack reports spam recipients after transient failures.
   ```
   </details>
   <details>
   <summary><b>Steps of Reproduction ✅ </b></summary>
   
   ```mdx
   1. In `superset/commands/report/execute.py:13-38`, `BaseReportState._send()` 
builds a
   notification via `create_notification(recipient, notification_content)` 
(line 25), which
   returns a `SlackV2Notification` instance when `recipient.type ==
   ReportRecipientType.SLACKV2` (factory in
   `superset/reports/notifications/__init__.py:25-34`).
   
   2. `_send()` then calls `notification.send()` for non-dry runs at
   `superset/commands/report/execute.py:36-37`, placing 
`SlackV2Notification.send()` on the
   main execution path for scheduled alerts/reports.
   
   3. Inside `SlackV2Notification.send()`
   (`superset/reports/notifications/slackv2.py:92-120`), `_get_channels()` 
(lines 59-67)
   parses a multi-channel target string like `"C12345,C67890,C11111"` (as used 
in
   `test_v2_send_to_multiple_channels_uploads_per_channel` at
   `tests/unit_tests/reports/notifications/slack_tests.py:86-102`) into a list, 
then `send()`
   iterates `for channel in channels` and, when files are present, nested `for 
file in files`
   calls `client.files_upload_v2(...)` for each channel/file pair.
   
   4. If a transient Slack failure occurs after some uploads/messages 
succeed—for example,
   `client.files_upload_v2` or `client.chat_postMessage` raises `SlackApiError` 
for a later
   channel/file—`SlackV2Notification.send()` maps that to
   `NotificationUnprocessableException` via the `except 
(SlackClientNotConnectedError,
   SlackApiError)` and `except SlackClientError` blocks at
   `superset/reports/notifications/slackv2.py:128-141`, re-raising
   `NotificationUnprocessableException` after earlier channels/files have 
already been sent.
   
   5. The `@backoff.on_exception(NotificationUnprocessableException, ...)` 
decorator on
   `send()` at `superset/reports/notifications/slackv2.py:80-91` catches this 
exception and
   retries the entire `send()` method from the beginning, re-running the `for 
channel` / `for
   file` loops and re-invoking `files_upload_v2`/`chat_postMessage` for 
channels/files that
   previously succeeded, thereby duplicating Slack messages/files for those 
recipients on
   each retry attempt.
   ```
   </details>
   
   [![Fix in 
Cursor](https://new-codeant-butcket.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/badges/fix-in-cursor-flat.svg)](https://app.codeant.ai/fix-in-ide?tool=cursor&prompt_id=e552b10b71b44cc28f76f417201ae726&service=github&base_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&org=apache&repo=apache%2Fsuperset)
 [![Fix in VSCode 
Claude](https://new-codeant-butcket.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/badges/fix-in-vscode-claude-flat.svg)](https://app.codeant.ai/fix-in-ide?tool=vscode-claude&prompt_id=e552b10b71b44cc28f76f417201ae726&service=github&base_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&org=apache&repo=apache%2Fsuperset)
   
   *(Use Cmd/Ctrl + Click for best experience)*
   <details>
   <summary><b>Prompt for AI Agent 🤖 </b></summary>
   
   ```mdx
   This is a comment left during a code review.
   
   **Path:** superset/reports/notifications/slackv2.py
   **Line:** 85:93
   **Comment:**
        *Logic Error: Retrying the entire `send` method on 
`NotificationUnprocessableException` can duplicate already-sent Slack 
messages/files when a failure happens mid-loop (for example after some channels 
succeeded and a later channel fails). On retry, the method replays all prior 
channels/files from the beginning, causing duplicate notifications. Move retry 
handling to the individual Slack API call level (or add idempotency guards) so 
only failed sends are retried.
   
   Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve 
this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.
   Once fix is implemented, also check other comments on the same PR, and ask 
user if the user wants to fix the rest of the comments as well. if said yes, 
then fetch all the comments validate the correctness and implement a minimal fix
   ```
   </details>
   <a 
href='https://app.codeant.ai/feedback?pr_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fsuperset%2Fpull%2F39914&comment_hash=ecbeaa9dd5e86181eab5d2c09ac86f2d1ef9c90b1bd7e1ac104db51b2bf29992&reaction=like'>👍</a>
 | <a 
href='https://app.codeant.ai/feedback?pr_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fsuperset%2Fpull%2F39914&comment_hash=ecbeaa9dd5e86181eab5d2c09ac86f2d1ef9c90b1bd7e1ac104db51b2bf29992&reaction=dislike'>👎</a>



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to