sadpandajoe commented on code in PR #44880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/pull/44880#discussion_r4178589518
##########
superset-frontend/src/filters/components/Select/SelectFilterPlugin.tsx:
##########
@@ -200,11 +221,23 @@ export default function PluginFilterSelect(props:
PluginFilterSelectProps) {
const [likeInputValue, setLikeInputValue] = useState<string>(
filterState.value?.[0] != null ? String(filterState.value[0]) : '',
);
+ // null until the user types in the LIKE input; distinguishes a real edit
+ // from the clearAllTrigger reset below, which also clears likeInputValue
+ // but must not re-trigger a dispatch once the deferred value catches up.
+ const [pendingLikeValue, setPendingLikeValue] = useState<string |
null>(null);
+ const settleLikeValue = useMemo(
+ () => debounce(setPendingLikeValue, Constants.SLOW_DEBOUNCE),
+ [],
+ );
+ useEffect(() => () => settleLikeValue.cancel(), [settleLikeValue]);
useEffect(() => {
const externalValue =
filterState.value?.[0] != null ? String(filterState.value[0]) : '';
setLikeInputValue(externalValue);
+ // A parent-driven value change supersedes any settled edit, so re-entering
+ // the same text afterwards registers as a fresh edit.
+ setPendingLikeValue(null);
Review Comment:
The `Bob` default forces a different internal mask, so this passes without
covering the cleared-default path where re-entering `Jen` can leave
`defaultDataMask` unset. Could the regression reset to `undefined` without a
replacement default, then assert that re-entering `Jen` publishes a new mask?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
