rusackas commented on issue #45019:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/45019#issuecomment-6320679117

   Numbered as SIP-234 (noting to @sadpandajoe and @msyavuz that sip numbering 
got out of whack with thieir sips opened right after this one, but all good... 
they're uniquely numbered at least, even if not chronological)
   
   I'm kind of inclined to think we don't need a SIP for this, as long as we 
keep backward compatibility with the currently supported version. As long as 
there's no breaking change to contend with, I suspect this is fine to proceed, 
but consensus is indeed warranted here, so I'll at least ping @villebro / 
@michael-s-molina / @sadpandajoe for their thoughts. 
   
   An easier yet still formal/official approach here would be to just put up a 
"lazy consensus" thread on the dev@ list... then if nobody objects within three 
days, you have the go-ahead you need, and this can be closed.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to