On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:25:41 -0400, Austin Clements <amdra...@mit.edu> wrote: > Had I replaced it, though, there are two variations I would have > tried. Have you guys considered these and, if so, any thoughts? > > * Make SPC mark the *current* message read and move to the next one, > rather than moving to the next and marking it read. This way, you're > acknowledging the message as read once you've actually read it, rather > than having notmuch mark it read before you've actually read it.
I agree. I think it's up to the user to define whether he read the message. In fact as a consequence, I have no use of the 'unread' tag. > * At the end of the thread, return to the index view. This way, if > you want to archive the thread, you can still just press 'a', but if > you don't, you're already set to navigate to another thread. I would prefer just to do nothing (or bell) at the end of the thread. Sometimes the end of a message is just at the end of the screen, and I want to hit space to see the next message, so I think that returning to the index would surprise me (as going to the next thread does). But this could be a third option if some people prefer that. So we would have: - do nothing - archive go to the next thread - return to the index Matthieu _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
