On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:45:53 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin 
<dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW there were patches to support tmux (or maybe it was dtach).  IIRC
> the consensus was that supporting it does not worth complicating test
> lib.  I think this can be reconsidered if it turns out that many users
> do not have screen, but do have tmux.  But you never know if the
> patches are not applied.  They have been around for several months, I
> doubt you would suddenly get feedback now.

I'm the one that wrote the tmux patch (and suggested dtach), and yes in
the end the consensus was that it wasn't worth it.

About adding prereqs to the test suite -- in my private branch I have a
rebased and fixed version of the patch series sent by Pieter Praet [1].
It worked fine last time I tested it on a system without screen and in a
chroot without emacs/gpg/screen, so if anyone is interested I can post
it here. (Cc'ing Pieter)

[1] id:"1307016220-17509-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org"

-- 
Thomas/Schnouki

Attachment: pgpkCwVQbAc44.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Reply via email to