Hi Thomas.

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:39:36 +0200, Thomas Jost <schno...@schnouki.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:45:53 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin 
> <dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > BTW there were patches to support tmux (or maybe it was dtach).  IIRC
> > the consensus was that supporting it does not worth complicating test
> > lib.  I think this can be reconsidered if it turns out that many users
> > do not have screen, but do have tmux.  But you never know if the
> > patches are not applied.  They have been around for several months, I
> > doubt you would suddenly get feedback now.
> 
> I'm the one that wrote the tmux patch (and suggested dtach), and yes in
> the end the consensus was that it wasn't worth it.
> 
> About adding prereqs to the test suite -- in my private branch I have a
> rebased and fixed version of the patch series sent by Pieter Praet [1].
> It worked fine last time I tested it on a system without screen and in a
> chroot without emacs/gpg/screen, so if anyone is interested I can post
> it here. (Cc'ing Pieter)
> 

Cool.  You have Pieter's series plus a patch for screen, right?

Please post it, I am interested :)

Regards,
  Dmitry

> [1] id:"1307016220-17509-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org"
> 
> -- 
> Thomas/Schnouki
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Reply via email to