On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:50:06 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:23:32 +0000, David Edmondson <d...@dme.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:15:11 +0000, Mark Walters > > <markwalters1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi I have reviewed the patch series within the limits of my lisp > > > knowledge. Patch 1: is rather beyond my lisp so I won't comment on that > > > (and I have never tried crypto): Patches 2-5 look fine with one > > > bikeshed and one query for my own understanding. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > The bikeshed is that I agree with Jani in > > > id:"CAB+hUn8KhXHTRCdrLe0cT=8mdtz9ZntPFf13mq0iCo4CX=b...@mail.gmail.com" > > > that I would prefer to reserve '>' for saving a file. > > > > '<' is 'remove indent', or 'look to the left'. > > '>' is 'toggle truncation', or 'look to the right'. > > > > (I'm not overly worried about this - would 't' be more acceptable?) > > I personally would prefer 't' but it is easy to remap so it really isn't > important.
Anything goes. 't' is easier than '>'... As a previous vm/gnus user iirc 't' toggles headers and 'o' outputs file there. If we paid attention to these 2 and rmail and mew and mh-e we could figure out compatible keybindings where usable/appripriate... ... I think I just assigned this check to me... > > Best wishes > > Mark Tomi _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
