Quoth David Bremner on Mar 10 at 10:09 am: > > As usual, nothing brings out the bug reports like a freeze. > > There are some patches that should probably go in, but could use one > more pair of eyes. > > id:"[email protected]"
I looked at this and just sent a question to Jani id:"[email protected]" If the answer is that it's okay, then consider my eyes one more pair. > We had a somewhat lively debate about desirablity of the following > patch. My decision is that for now, we avoid changing the behaviour of > notmuch, and do apply the patch. We can discuss later deprecating or > changing this permissive behaviour. > > id:"[email protected]" Alternatively, can we just require GMime 2.6.7 by applying id:"[email protected]" instead of id:"[email protected]" and id:"[email protected]" ? > This patch from Austin seems innocent enough, and I plan to push it to > release. > > id:"[email protected]" The worst-case scenario with applying this patch is that notmuch will verbosely fail to show a message where it would otherwise crash, so I'd go for it. > I'm not sure about including > > id:"[email protected]" > > it wouldn't really help debian (as the unstable buildds already have > 2.6.6), but I guess it might help others building debian packages. (See my comment about 2.6.7 above.) > Although > > id:"[email protected]" > > is marked as trivial and is certainly short, I'd like one more pair of > eyes before pushing to release. I approve this patch. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
