On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:16:01 -0400, Austin Clements <[email protected]> wrote: > > We had a somewhat lively debate about desirablity of the following > > patch. My decision is that for now, we avoid changing the behaviour of > > notmuch, and do apply the patch. We can discuss later deprecating or > > changing this permissive behaviour. > > > > id:"[email protected]" > > Alternatively, can we just require GMime 2.6.7 by applying > id:"[email protected]" > instead of > id:"[email protected]" > and > id:"[email protected]" > ?
I much prefer this solution (i.e. just require GMime 2.6.7 and no notmuch patches). I still think we need some sort of coherent approach for rejecting mbox, but I think it will require a lot more thought. jamie.
pgpsS7RKHswq7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
