Tomi Ollila <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Aug 12 2016, David Bremner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> writes: >>> +++ b/util/crypto.c >>> @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ >> >>> +#include "notmuch.h" >> >> It feels wrong to me for a file in util/ to include notmuch.h. It seems >> the same situation holds with search-path.h. There it seems we use >> notmuch_bool_t (although I'm not convinced that's the right return >> type). If that's the only reason maybe we should either factor out the >> definition or just return ints. > > util/search-path.c is easy, change to int or bool (and include stdbool.h, > as parse-time-string.c does) > > util/crypto.c is harder. it uses many more \bnotmuch_.* types. perhaps this > could be moved to lib/ instead ?
I guess the issue is we don't want to export these functions as ppart of the API, but we do want to use them in the CLI. I _thought_ that util/crypto.c only (or mainly) used _notmuch_crypto_t, which is defined in crypto.h. Given the various constraints, I think that is probably OK. Some kind of purism about naming things in util/ might suggest they not be called notmuch, but that is probably silly (although I admit I had that thought). d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
