also sprach David Bremner <david at tethera.net> [2009.12.17.0218 +1300]: > I agree that the labels-in-headers approach has some nice > advantages. I haven't thought through merging of tag lists, but > maybe that is no worse than other approaches. One thing that > worries me a bit is that notmuch updates tags often, and each of > these updates would require rewriting the message, at least in the > obvious implementation.
If we separated implicit and explicit tags, then that issue would not exist, and from all I can tell, only the privacy issues, and the risk of losing mail when files are rewritten persist. -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ DISCLAIMER: this entire message is privileged communication, intended for the sole use of its recipients only. If you read it even though you know you aren't supposed to, you're a poopy-head. spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100108/827e9650/attachment.pgp>