On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:59:54 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at 
fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> But: what does the "signed" tag mean? i wouldn't want to necessarily
> conflate these four ideas:

These are good points, Daniel.  However, I had actually just been
thinking of something much simpler, along the lines of just tagging
"signed" any message with a "multipart/signed" part, and "encrypted" any
message with a "multipart/encrypted" part.

This simpler approach would certainly satisfy my needs, without having
to get into sorting out all the complicated details in the points you
brought up.

Does that sound like it would work for folks, or would they like to see
a more nuanced approach to handling tagging of signed/encrypted

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available

Reply via email to