Floris Bruynooghe <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Mar 21 2018, Justus Winter wrote: >> >> Floris Bruynooghe <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> This is exactly what I have fixed in my alternative bindings which I >>> created around the end of last year [0]. So we do have an idea of how >>> to fix this, at the time I said I do believe that it's possible to also >>> do this for the existing bindings even though it is a lot of work. >>> After some talking between dkg and me we got to a way forward which >>> proposed this, but I must admit that after messing a little with getting >>> a pytest run integrated into the notmuch test-suite instead of using tox >>> I lost momentum on the project and didn't advance any further. >> >> I'm sorry that I didn't speak up when you announced your work. I'm >> actually excited about a new set of bindings for Python. I agree with >> using cffi. I briefly looked at the code, and I believe it is much >> nicer than what we currently have. > > Nice to hear, thanks!
Thanks for all the work :) >> I trust that it works fine with Python 3, does it? > > The version I made so far *only* works on Python 3. Mostly because it > was easier, but it also allows some API niceties. Reasonable choice. Which versions of Python 3 are supported? I am also writing bindings and I am wondering which versions to target. Cheers, Justus
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
