Justus Winter <jus...@sequoia-pgp.org> writes: >> This is exactly what I have fixed in my alternative bindings which I >> created around the end of last year . So we do have an idea of how >> to fix this, at the time I said I do believe that it's possible to also >> do this for the existing bindings even though it is a lot of work. >> After some talking between dkg and me we got to a way forward which >> proposed this, but I must admit that after messing a little with getting >> a pytest run integrated into the notmuch test-suite instead of using tox >> I lost momentum on the project and didn't advance any further. > > I'm sorry that I didn't speak up when you announced your work. I'm > actually excited about a new set of bindings for Python. I agree with > using cffi. I briefly looked at the code, and I believe it is much > nicer than what we currently have.
I can into this thread late. However, my priorities for python bindings would be: * I don't care about anything less then Python 3.5. * Reliable Python 3.6 support important. * Packages should be available from pypi.python.org I have found the current official bindings unreliable with Python 3.x, and tend to cause aborts on exiting and/or fail to save updates. As such, for now I have downgraded to Python 2.7 for now. -- Brian May <br...@linuxpenguins.xyz> https://linuxpenguins.xyz/brian/ _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch