Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> writes: > On Sun 2019-04-21 16:29:02 -0300, David Bremner wrote: >> the html rebuild is much faster than the texinfo + info rebuilds. > > agreed, in the runs that i've been doing as well. I was concerned that > the html rebuild itself may have been *triggering* the rebuild of the > texinfo stuff, though. Sounds like you don't think that's the case. > >> I've posted some patches for the sphinx-doc issues a couple of hours ago >> (id:20190421171245.19729-1-da...@tethera.net). > > thanks! your own commentary on that series seems to acknowledge that > there are problems with it (though i don't understand the tradeoffs > well).
There was a problem with the first patch, which I replaced with two more. > Is there no way to give make itself full visibility into the specific > generated files so it can do its comparisons directly? I'm obviously > not asking you to rewrite the entire native sphinx build system, i'm > just observing that at present it seems suboptimal, though i don't know > how to fix it either :/ I'm open to ideas, but keep in mind we want to support parallel make, which means we have to be careful not to trigger multiple invocations of sphinx-build in parallel. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list email@example.com https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch