Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> writes: > On Mon 2019-04-22 21:03:05 -0300, David Bremner wrote: >> There was a problem with the first patch, which I replaced with two more. > > thanks. i've reviewed and published my review on that series. I think > it should probably be merged. > >> I'm open to ideas, but keep in mind we want to support parallel make, >> which means we have to be careful not to trigger multiple invocations of >> sphinx-build in parallel.
> hm, i'm not entirely sure why sphinx-build can't be run in parallel, if > it could target the creation of specific files (but maybe it can't). It can target specific files according to the documentation, but the main issue is that it caches a bunch of state under doc/_build/doctrees. It doesn't do any kind of locking, so multiple writers leads to build failures. > > I do note that (independent of this series), if i run the following > loop: > > > while make -j4 --trace; do > python3 -c 'print("="*100)' > touch doc/man1/notmuch-reply.rst > done > > then only every second run of make contains this info: > I think I see this also, but no idea yet what is going on. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list email@example.com https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch