Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> writes: > headers: headers, > + crypto?: crypto, # omitted if crypto disabled, or if no part > was signed or encrypted. > body?: [part] # omitted if --body=false > }
I'm wondering about the "upward compatible" aspect of this. If the crypto key is ommitted, a client doesn't know whether to interpret that as no part was signed or encrypted, or just an older version of notmuch. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
