Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> writes: > > or, should we just make the crypto member always present? >
That was what I was thinking, sorry to be less explicit than I could have been. > Another alternative is to condition the presence of the crypto member on > the arguments (like if --verify is set), but the decision for --decrypt > is a bit awkward because of our default of --decrypt=auto. > _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
