On Sat, 2025-11-08 at 20:45 +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > To be precise, we need to supply this because of a shortcoming in the > `register`` macro: it doesn't support read-only registers yet, and write > support requires a `Default` implementation for its fields. This is > subject to be fixed in the future but for now we need this little > workaround.
This definitely feels like something that needs a TODO comment.
