I did miss some. I guess I need to reread. Sent from space
On Aug 4, 2010, at 2:19 PM, "Michael Gundlach" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Paul Voccio <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Shouldn’t the layer be pluggable if I wanted a different datastore? FYI in case you missed the thread on WSGI, modules, and services: whether the memory were local or in a memcache or otherwise, the layer would be pluggable. We'll provide a caching library that is a language binding to pluggable cache backends -- mock, local, memcache, or otherwise. Auth* will have the same structure, allowing mock, LDAP, etc. So while I don't think the cache should be in-memory as Eric has drawn it, I think pluggability is still assumed in the diagram. Michael
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nova Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nova More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
