Check out https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg00014.html for a semi-overview
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Paul Voccio <[email protected]>wrote: > I did miss some. I guess I need to reread. > > Sent from space > > On Aug 4, 2010, at 2:19 PM, "Michael Gundlach" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Paul Voccio < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Shouldn’t the layer be pluggable if I wanted a different datastore? >> > > FYI in case you missed the thread on WSGI, modules, and services: whether > the memory were local or in a memcache or otherwise, the layer would be > pluggable. We'll provide a caching library that is a language binding to > pluggable cache backends -- mock, local, memcache, or otherwise. Auth* will > have the same structure, allowing mock, LDAP, etc. > > So while I don't think the cache should be in-memory as Eric has drawn it, > I think pluggability is still assumed in the diagram. > > Michael > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nova Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nova More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
