On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:32:32PM -0800, kk yap wrote: > I might be wrong, but from my understanding there is nothing in > OpenFlow that dictates reliable execution of commands received.
I'm not aware of wording that says a switch may simply ignore a command. The transport is TCP (or SSL on TCP), so nothing is going to get accidentally lost. > I would also prefer an error, but which one would your switch send for > being too busy? This is the 6 I know of. I'm not sure what you mean by "too busy". I would assume that, if a switch is busy, it would just take longer to execute commands. If it can't execute any commands at the moment, then it should stop reading commands from the OpenFlow connection. _______________________________________________ nox-dev mailing list [email protected] http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev_noxrepo.org
