On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:01:08AM -0800, Teemu Koponen wrote: > > On Mar 9, 2010, at 09:20 , Martin Casado wrote: > > I absolutely agree, this needs to be fixed in the OpenFlow > > specification. Else, it is near impossible to build scalable > > controllers who maintain consistent state. The only caveats to > > consider would be for packet ins (we can maintain the best effort > > delivery model for datagram forwarding) and potentially flow > > expirations due to inactivity timers. > > Packet-ins definitely belong to the data plane and can be reliable but
"can be unreliable"? > flow expirations are definitely a part of control plane operations > which should be reliable. _______________________________________________ nox-dev mailing list [email protected] http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev_noxrepo.org
