You can review the imported contents here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/gmcdonald/npanday/incubator/npanday/
This is up to r60216 at codeplex. The final revisions will be added later today. Please take a look over the contents and provide comments today so we can do the official import tomorrow and move forward! Cheers, Brett On 31/08/2010, at 12:24 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: > Great Job Brett! Way to go on persevering with the svn on codeplex. Let us > know how we can help with the transfer. > > Thanks, > > -- > Joe Ocaba > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brett Porter" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:17:23 AM > Subject: Re: Code import > > I'm making progress here slowly. It will be ready this week, hopefully by the > time accounts are created to be able to commit. > > After a few different attempts I found rsvndump to be the most reliable > alternative for getting all of the SVN data out of Codeplex. I made some > modifications to it to work a bit faster and avoid some timeouts retrieving > logs, etc. However, it's still choking on operations on the /tags/ directory. > You may be aware that we had problems copying into the tags directory due to > these issues and had to move to /releases/. I did some auditing of this and > have removed several failed release attempts and branches that were > ultimately deleted and not used for anything, then recreated release tags > properly instead of dumping it (using the original author and timestamp). So > it's not all the history, but it is all of the relevant history and will > actually make it easier to trace the changes back. > > In addition to this, I've extracted the history for the application of a > number of patches that was done in the lead up to starting the codeplex > project, so there'll be some additional history available linking back to the > fork from the NMaven podling. > > Let me know if you have any questions or comments! > > Cheers, > Brett > > On 19/08/2010, at 11:44 AM, Liit Padilla wrote: > >> + 1 on option 3 >> >> thanks, >> >> liit >> >> On 8/19/2010 9:39 AM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: >>> I'm +1 on starting from the NMaven branchpoint and applying the patches. We >>> could use really use those histories. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Lars Corneliussen"<[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 2:18:56 AM >>> Subject: Re: Code import >>> >>> Sometimes I missed the history from NMaven. So option three would be great, >>> if you ask me. >>> >>> And yes I have a working git clone. I First fetched the oldest revision >>> explicitely and then did the svn rebase. >>> >>> -- >>> Message sent from mobile device >>> >>> Am 17.08.2010 um 14:02 schrieb Brett Porter<[email protected]>: >>> >>> >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> I've made a few attempts at how we might import the code from Codeplex a >>>> while back. It's quite difficult due to the svnbridge that doesn't support >>>> most of the mirroring without difficulties (svnsync, git-svn, hg). The >>>> most workable solution to keep history intact seems to be recreating the >>>> individual commits (with svn:author, svn:date and svn:log values), which >>>> is something "tfs2svn" tries to do. That's been working ok, but I didn't >>>> get the whole way through. I think Lars managed a git clone somehow that >>>> might be a helpful basis too? >>>> >>>> There's 3 alternatives: >>>> - direct import of latest code, leaving history behind >>>> - take the codeplex revs across as a new import into the svn repository >>>> (maintain history as it was at codeplex) >>>> - start from the previous nmaven branchpoint in the incubator and apply >>>> the changes on top of it up until today (full history since where it >>>> forked from). I have the revision details to achieve this if wanted. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? How much history do we want to keep? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Brett >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Brett Porter >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >>>> >>>> >> > > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
